WolfPack 102: Sensors

img001-1000This sensor was hidden in the middle of an Afghan village on 31 July 2011. It was positioned to spy over a dirt road intersection about 10-20 meters away. US casualties were occurring in this village. Six hours before this photograph was taken, perhaps a couple of hundred meters away, Brice Scott was shot and killed in a firefight. Weeks after this sensor was emplaced, on 11 September 2011, we were back in the village when an IED strike occurred no more than 20 meters away from the sensor location.

28 November 2012

War revolves around sensing.  But despite our technology, nothing replaces human senses, experience, and intuition.

The U.S. military historically fights enemies on their home field.  Many of our enemies are subsistence farmers.  The greatest optic that they possess will be scratched-up non-prescription eyeglasses that are sold beside shoes in the market.  Most will have no windows in their homes.  These farmers are rugged and tuned-in to their environments.

Movement that is slow for us is fast to them.  Villagers make terrible drivers. They do not have the time-versus-distance thing worked out, making them dangerous in cities.

img002-1000Afghan police accident, Panjwai, 2011

We buy vehicles for Afghan security forces, which they constantly wreck.  It is a bloodbath.

Afghan villagers are primitive, but they are clever.  On the macro-level, they cannot build a road or a bridge.  Yet within their thimbles of existence, they are not to be trifled with, unless we decide to bring full war, in which case they would be craters.  We hobble ourselves, waging limited war, creating the conditions that permit them to beat us, like mosquitoes tracking, tormenting, and overwhelming a blundering and clumsy beast.

On the scale of the mosquito, where we choose to meet our enemies, feud and conflict is woven into their many cultures.  Like mosquitoes, they do not need cars or electricity or hospitals to survive.  Afghans depend on their bio-webs.

Note: When I coined the term “bio-web,” a check revealed vague usage relating to biological entities integrated with computer networks. The term bio-web in these dispatches refers specifically to the interaction of organisms in their natural state, including men and their environment.

img003-1000Thermal sensor, rangefinder, camera and more. Despite all of our gadgets, the enemy enjoys bio-web dominance in Afghanistan.

When it comes to detecting human movements, electronics can be lifesaving and decisive, yet an amazing volume of biological communication occurs in the bio-web.  Researchers have learned that trees conduct sophisticated exchanges with one another.  Mosquitoes and other bloodsuckers have more tracking complexity stuffed into their bodies than do F-22s.  A biology teacher once taught me that all living things eat, breathe, and give off waste.  They also do one more thing: they sense.

Organisms have been tried as sensors for electronic devices.  During the Vietnam War, there was great difficulty sensing beneath the jungle canopy, where Americans employed ground sensors to detect the enemy on trails.  Some devices were airdropped, but early models could not discriminate between man and beast.

Mexican bedbugs specialize in human meals.  They go wild from afar when they sense humans.  One effort to overcome the sensing problem saw engineers attaching bedbugs to phonograph needles.  The program was not a success, but it was nevertheless a clever attempt to tap directly into the bio-web.

Similarly, there is a poorly charted field of research using what engineers call biosensors.  These include electro-antennogram research to employ insect antennas to sense everything from explosives to man.  This has nothing to do with the biosensors, bio-web, or tracking topics discussed here.

img004-1000There were many firefights in this village. Brice Scott was shot and killed just a few hundred meters away from this family compound. Besides the bombs and the firefights, and the MEDEVAC flying past, there is a major clue in this photograph that we are in enemy territory. Can you spot it?

In Afghan villages, noises that are soft to us are loud for farmers.  Smells that we will not notice – such as laundry soap – are a punch in the nose for villagers.  Some of our guys call Afghans “stinkies,” and Afghans say similar things about us.

Their smell is feral.  Ours is a corporate fireworks of soaps, skin products, insect repellants, weapon lubricants, and the foods that we eat.  Our smell is strong.  Hunters wash their clothes several times without soap, and sun-dry them to avoid odors.  Some of our Special Forces did this during the Vietnam war, but today nobody seems to pay attention to the powerful odor trails that we leave.

img005-1000That boot should tingle the survival antenna. The only Afghans in Zhari district that wear boots or athletic shoes are the enemy. All of the firefights, with no reports of foreigners, indicate that the smiling locals are shooting at us, and this compound had a worn out boot.

In Afghanistan, military laundry is done corporately on the bases.  The troops hand in their laundry bags to workers from the Philippines, from Nepal or from Africa, and they wash it and dry it, including dryer sheets.  These workers all smell different.  In Thailand, the Thai say that many foreigners stink, and they can actually smell us.  (The Thai usually only tell you this if you are a good friend, and if the subject comes up.)

After you have been away from soldiers, and “normal” smells (for us), the collective odor of soldiers is striking.  It is important to keep in mind that you will often not be tracking just one quarry, but many, and the same applies for the enemy.  The smallest elements that we use will consist of two soldiers, but normally it will be at least a dozen.  So if you can track one soldier, imagine how easy it can be to track ten or twenty men. Their collective smell can be significant, and in some environments it will linger.  I can often smell an Arab, for example. Many of them use sandalwood, which is easy to smell.

Soldiers who dip snuff tobacco leave scent trails and spit trails, while smokers are an olfactory signal flare.  Smokers might as well walk and toss stink bombs.  Only one soldier needs to be detected to compromise a unit.  (Speaking of which, our confounded press machine no longer allows embedded writers to wear camouflage when out with combat units. During my last embed, I ignored this rule.  Who thinks up stuff like this?  Nobody with combat experience would come up with that nonsense.)

Deep inside, we are all hunters and trackers.  It is no exaggeration that a unit can be smelled from hundreds of meters away, even when you can see or hear no other trace.  People who live in the bush say that they can smell others from miles away, depending on variables such as weather and terrain.  Your nose will work better on a dark night.  I am not a psychologist, so will not venture to speculate why.  From the standpoint of physics, scents settle on a cool night.

One time in India, I was walking in the jungle searching for cannibals and I smelled elephants.  I thought that they were close, but I was near a stream, so it is possible that their scent was flowing down the stream.  Smells can flow like water, and so cool parts of the jungle can be good places to pick up scent trails.

Dog handlers learn these things, so they are great resources. Handlers do not like to work their dogs on hot days when smells float upwards, and the puppy gets tired and goes to sleep.  I was on a mission during a hot day in Afghanistan and a dog walked right by a bomb.  An EOD specialist spotted it after the dog missed it.  This happens a lot.  If there is a choice between ten trained dogs or one EOD specialist, I would take the EOD sergeant.  Dogs are fantastic at times, but only a nut would choose a dog over a trained EOD expert for spotting bombs.

(Note: One way to lose a dog team is to physically wear out the handler and the dog.  Go fast and far and they get worn out and stop. Or ambush the team and shoot the handler. Do not waste ammo on the dog. Without the handler, the dog is useless.  After one British handler was killed in Afghanistan for example, his dog died, apparently of a broken heart.  It is not you against the dog, but you against the handler.  The dog is his sensor pod.)

When I have been away from women for extended periods, the first whiff of a female crackles the senses.  It hits like a wave.  It is more than a smell.  You smell a stinky man, but you sense a woman.  Her presence ripples through the skin. You look around, and there she is.

Not to digress, but this creates issues downrange where men can go months without seeing a woman, and a lot of these men are in their twenties and they see female forms when looking at trees.  There is no doubt that if I have not seen a woman in a couple of months, I can sense her presence in a jungle.  But on a day-to-day basis, where you might encounter hundreds of women, this sense is dulled.

In some areas of the world, villagers can smell snakes, or detect their presence by the cries of birds.   One of my Collie dogs in Florida was a snake detector.  She had a special bark for “Snake! Snake! Snake!”  My grandfather grew up as a swamp boy in southern Georgia.  He could smell rattlers, and he was a terrible driver.

Floridians often know when a cat or a serpent is slipping by, from the sound made by a squawking Blue Jay.  When my Collie heard the Blue Jay’s warning, she would run to see.  When there was a snake, she would bark for me to come.  So the Blue Jay (who may have been tipped by some other creature) would scream a warning, then my dog would run to confirm, and she only barked for me when there really was a snake.  All of this happened in ten seconds.  Bio-web.

Some birds, such as Honeyguides, make a living by guiding people to honey.  The bio-webs are thick with interwoven triggers. This is all part of tracking.

Who has the sensor advantage in Afghanistan?  Circumstance is key, but on the whole, for mature wars such as Afghanistan, the sensor advantage belongs to local villagers and their bio-web, which includes clusters of villages.

We use watches to tell time.  They use calendars.  They have watched us for more than ten years.  We send young soldiers to Afghanistan who have hardly traveled beyond their home county just a year before.  Some of our young soldiers might have six months of training. The enemy has a dozen years of war experience.  The enemy knows our habits, our smells, and our sounds, and we use statistics to try to predict theirs.

We call these statistics “tracking,” and to be sure, this is a form of new-school tracking that can be melded with the old-school, making a meta-school that is far deadlier than either.  Our statistics apparatus only works in mature wars that have taken on the tone of police work, where we fight over the same area for a long period and thus have time to collect data.  When you step into a new battle space, such statistics do not exist.

Statistics are often derived postmortem.  In the case of quick wars, or wars on the march, the sorts of statistics that we use to predict enemy actions in Afghanistan are useless.

(Stay tuned for Wolf Pack 103)

Comments   

 
+3 # Outstanding and about TimeMark K. 2012-11-28 18:38
Michael:

Thank you for this - I have been waiting for someone to point out the obvious exposure.

I have long studied tracking and spent hours and days out of reach. Over time and with practice you can build up the sensory factory that modern life extinguishes. My "practice" will often entail trekking for an hour or more to some location and remain there - quiet - observing - and moving only when some animal, small bird or iguana crosses over terrain in an odd manner which will require that I slowly relocate to the place to review the ground.

You learn a lot this way and you certainly develop senses that you did not even know you had. One thing is for sure - I can hear a human coming, at a minimum of a 1/4 mile, I can smell them (with the right wind/conditions ) at almost the same distance and I can see them - even in some difficult bush - at least 100 to 200 yards away.

I have had many occasions where a group of people have passed down some trail within 5 meters of me - sitting almost in open view - and never once noticed I was there. The whole process, at least for me, develops a sense of higher understanding and perception.

Over the years I have taken my son and my daughter on these treks and have watched them go from being "tired" or "bored" to now wanting me to go "away" because I am giving them up to the critters. My son is 18 and adamant about becoming a medic in SEAL Unit. He now understands and has come to appreciate these long hot hours in the bush.

As your Article points out, I too see a lack of training in our military regarding the development of the "senses" which if done would certainly put our brave men and women at lower risk level in some way and in certain situations even they must move in a pack.

Once again, this is great Article and I appreciate the opportunity to read and share my voice for what it is worth.

God bless
Reply | Report to administrator
 
 
+1 # advanced manuever tacticsPeter 2012-11-28 20:14
Michael,
to the layman, this is not Wolfpack 101 to 103, but Advance Maneuver and Pincer tactics! Hope hope General Allen can find the time for this!
Reply | Report to administrator
 
 
+4 # smellsCarl 2012-11-28 21:09
As a biologist, I can confirm much of what you have said. For example, our ancesters noticed a long time ago that something about women causes men to behave in a strange way. Because of this, they developed the idea that women have something which causes men's behavior to change. Some people began to call these kooties but the liberal feminists rejected this idea and insisted men stop saying women have kooties. Years later, research found that women have what is called female sex pheromones (molecules), which, when taken into the male nasal cavity, alters the function of the male mind and behavior. It turns out that women do have kooties, but so do men. :-) It is the female sex pheromones which cause men in the wild to "go wild" when they detect the "smell" of women.

It is also important to understand that, when the human nasal sensors become over whelmed by certain molecules, they can't pick up additional molecules for that smell (those molecular receptors become filled) but, when those molecules have not been present for a while and the nasal sensors have had time to clear out the old molecules, the effects of new molecules hitting those sensors send strong messages to the brain.

Years ago I realized that, if I were to be a solo operative behind enemy lines such as a sniper, the first thing I would do would be the study the indigenous people and my enemy. I would study their life styles including personal hygiene, diet, clothing, and everything else. I would spend at least one month purging myself of my culture's smells and adopting the smells required to go undetected by my enemy. I would personally hand wash all my clothing the same way and amount my enemy does their clothing. They wouldn't be able to smell me because I would smell like them. I would only use the American things for which I would need to fight them at our level while being able to fight them also at their level. You will still need a rifle, amunition, gun oil, and other such tools but, after a while, these will absorb enough of the smell of my enemy (my new smell) so that it will be more difficult for the enemy to smell them. Another strategy would be to obtain the smell of the local non combatants so everyone will be put at ease by my smell and increase the chance of surprising my enemy.

It is all about the molecules so I guess you could say using this could be called molecular warfare, after all, women have been using molecular warfare against men for thousands of years to control us. :-)
Reply | Report to administrator
 
 
# agreed...jerzy 2013-07-02 16:36
excellent points some of which I've pondered myself...
Reply | Report to administrator
 

Add comment

Due to the large amount of spam, all comments will be moderated before publication. Please be patient if you do not see your comment right away. Registered users who login first will have their comments posted immediately.


Security code
Refresh

Reader support is crucial to this mission. Weekly or monthly recurring ‘subscription’ based support is the best, though all are greatly appreciated.  Recurring and one-time donations are available through PayPal or Authorize.net.

supp

supp

subscribe

You can now help support the next dispatch with bitcoins:

Donate Bitcoins

My BitCoin QR Code

This is for use with BitCoin apps:

189