Dispatches
Important Update
Important Update
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|
Greetings,
The British Ministry of Defence canceled my embed after today's dispatch. Please Read "Bad Medicine".
Next Stop U.S. Forces.
Your Writer,
Michael
Reader support is crucial to this mission. Weekly or monthly recurring ‘subscription’ based support is the best, though all are greatly appreciated. Recurring and one-time donations are available through PayPal or Authorize.net.
To send a check or money order:
Michael Yon
P O Box 5553
Winter Haven, FL 33880-5553
I will continue to do my part in telling the stories that are not being told. Readers must also do their part by keeping the cash flowing. Cash is essential .
Thank you!
Michael








Comments
I'm sorry you won't be embedded with the UK troops anymore, as a Brit, a UK tax-payer and staunch supporter of our troops abroad I'm gutted the MOD has decided you should move on.
Was it Google Earth that got you invited out?
Go find some Canadians or get in with the Marines, they too are somewhat busy.
Stay safe and keep up the great work.
If you had not been their to write their stories we would never have a clue to these warriors work.
Good job.
Shame on the Ministry for canceling on you.
Their first reaction to it is to try and silence it, if they can't do that they will try and discredit it. failing that they will deflect blame or try and spin it. If they can't do that they will bury it and obscure it from the general public.
OPSEC isn't just used to keep the enemy in the dark...
Because if you dont after the next election the people might want to consider what you have not done. Years ago treason meant having your head cut off and put on a spike, and as we in the UK are big on tradition, perhaps we should re consider putting this back into law. ( we could also do the same to terrorists, then there will be no more repatriations of killers). As you can tell I'm pissed off.
As for the MoD - well we need people like you to tell us what is really going on in this war - because this govt are just plainly self serving liars. I can't tell you how badly I view the MoD and such people as bob 'aintbustinagut ' and his sidekick kevan.
I do hope you find a way to continue. May I suggest you also appeal to the retiring General Sir Richard Dannatt to see if he could not help your case.
Keep up the good work, wherever you end up.
So you see, you actually got it easy!
Regards
Mailman
Your dispatches have been a stark contrast to the normal diet of platitudes, half-truths and outright deceit fed to us by the professional sophists at MoD and by our largely disinterested and bone-idle media.
I very much hope you will find it possible to proceed with the post on election day and any others you may have in the pipeline covering your experience since.
Again, my sincere thanks, and best wishes for the future.
Hope you have better luck with the US political machine.
@Greg Marquez - You put too much faith in the loyalty of the British Government towards the NHS. Its the British people that love the NHS, successive Labour and Tory governments couldn't care less...
We are all speculating as to what led to you being withdrawn from your embed with 2 Rifles. I am sure we will find out in time if was because of your 24 August despatch, or the cancellation coincided with it...
Whatever the cause, I hope you will be able to resume reporting from the front line with the Brits. Thanks for everything Michael, and stay safe sir.
Cheers
Harry
Stay safe.
Excellent reporting, as always. Please could you confirm one thing? You wrote that the MOD cancelled your embed after "Bad Medicine". Was it as a direct result of that article? Or had your embed just come to an end and the timing was coincidental? Or was your embed over, and this article reminded them of the fact?
Thanks - hope you get another embed soon.
I suggest any and all Brit readers who want Michael's embed with UK troops to continue write to their MPs. I've asked my MP to write to Bob Ainsworth, the Secretary of State for Defense, to complain about the MODs action. At the very least you may make some MPs aware of Michael's work. You find out who your MP is and contact them by email through his website: http://www.theyworkforyou.com/
It only takes a minute to remind the politicians we are watching them. Make the time people.
The British are doing the serious heavy lifting in Afghanistan. As an American living in the UK married to one such Brit out there I was shocked to see the marked difference in coverage between America and the UK when I went home this Summer to the US. The UK benefits from far more daily news coverage, press stories and TV series covering their men’s actions. The change is enormous. By contrast the media coverage in America is a shoulder shrug. Mostly the Brits are lumped together under “international forces” and American support is waning for this war.
UK TV series “Ross Kemp in Afghanistan” was on his second journo tour this year and it, like your posts, was utterly compelling. There is another series on at the moment. ITV covered the medical facilities in February with “Doctors and Nurses at War” Again all compelling viewing. I urge Americans (and the Brits who feel bizarrely shortchanged!) to check these series out on youtube and continue to support the British out there. Yon’s posts were crucial for getting American home support. I hope he gets another embed quickly.
Here are some worthy UK charities and noteworthy places to stop by. Please give them your support!
Helpforheroes.com
supportoursoldiers.co.uk
honour-our-troops.com
youtube.com/user/helmandblog
Hopefully you will get another embed with the Brits. I agree some coverage of the Canadians and Australians would be awesome too. All brothers in arms. Nothing but respect and admiration for all our awesome men and women out there
And thank you for your continued dedication Michael.
Good luck.
far from it, i'm a fan. check out the following thread on the (British) Army Rumour Service: http://www.arrse.co.uk/Forums/viewtopic/t=131641/postdays=0/postorder=asc/start=0.html
It's too bad that the stories of units such as 2 Rifles will no longer be told. As has been obvious from your previous writing these under-reported and thus under-appriecia ted allies had one real chronicler - you. What was also obvious from your reporting was that those stories deserved to be told.
It's a better deal for our guys, though. We'll keep the support coming, regardless of who you're with.
God bless, stay healthy
You deserve a shiny bit of tin.
I wouldn't bet on that, you obviously have no experience dealing with military Public Affairs officers. Yon has been in pissing contests with US Army Public Affairs Officers on a number of occasions. There was one instance where he picked up a rifle and fired back at an insurgent who was shooting in his direction, but apart from that, the rest were petty.
"I was surprised Michael didn’t wish the Rifles well, I’m sure they had his back the entire time he was with them."
Now you're the one jumping to hasty conclusions. Do you suppose he might have said his goodbyes in person, since he could, rather than post them to a blog which is largely inaccessible to forward deployed troops?
"The British are doing the serious heavy lifting in Afghanistan."
I wouldn't say that either. In the last couple of months things have picked up considerably for conventional units like 2 Rifles and some US Marine battalions, but the 'heavy lifting' in Afghanistan is still being done by the special operations forces (US, UK, Polish, German, Canadian, etc - they work under the same command) Benjamin Kopp, of Kopp-Etchells Effect was one such soldier. In any event, it is best we don't hear too much about what they do.
It makes no sense that you cannot be embedded with the British army, but thanks for all your great work in giving us a real insight into the conflict and the determination of our service people to do their job no matter what.
Now we will have to rely on the usual biased media such as Al-beeb, whose heroic efforts to lift the morale of the enemy is so well appreciated. But I look forward to reading more of your dispatches. Michael, from being with the US forces. Good luck to you always.
Your reporting and photographs have been fantastic. Thank you. I too think you did a wonderful job of publicizing the experiences and mission of the Brits.
Best of luck,
Al in Canada
The next time you are in England maybe Wooton Bassett is worth a visit. The idiots at MOD cannot keep you away from there. As a good proportion of your readership appears to be the military themselves maybe a despatch from there would help dispell their feeling that those of us at home don't care.
With regard to the UK MOD I think that the perception of their "allegiance" has changed in recent years. In my time in the service (1981 - 2003) they were generally viewed by serving members as "our representatives " in government. Basicallly they were the good guys trying to get the best for us from a government with far too much on it's plate and too little money in its pocket. Now it seems to those serving members I talk to (including my son) that they are percieved as part of the problem. The MOD civil service are too highly politicised and are at best a conduit for the promotion of a party political agenda as opposed to the best interests of the services. The UK MOD no longer seems to have the effectiveness and well being of HM Forces as it's core aim. They are far more interested in hushing up the scandals as they come along and serving their career politician masters. I'm not saying that the whole MOD is rotten but they have, without doubt, lost the confidence of the average sailor, soldier and airman.
You do a good job, Michael and I shall continue to read your despatches wherever and with whoever you are embedded.
Which part do you think was "crazy": showing where troops were several days ago, or showing the location of a major base that must already be known by everybody within a 50 mile radius?
I have been following you for years, have told all of my vet friends and active duty people about your site and have tried to get the message out to any one who will listen ( and those who may not want to! ) A signed copy of Moment of Truth has made the rounds. I have always tried to throw a few $ in the jar when possible but now have made the commitment to send a regular contribution your way, you are doing way too an important job to let it founder. I am using the " old fashioned way" of having an automatic payment to sent to your snail mail address, if others are as wary of online payment that is an option they can use.
You always tell it like it is, and you have the insight to understand the reality, not the image that is trying to be conveyed by "whomever", the difference between theory and reality, right?
Keep the faith, drive on and God Speed
I very much enjoy your posts... I wish I was over there too... I gave some thought to why you may have been kicked out of your embed with 2 Rifles... Here's what I've come up with:
1) The Google map... It did help us readers, but could also encourage the opposition by providing them fresh tactical prospective on hitting the bases
2) Describing the payload the planes carry... Could be construed compromising information on planes firepower
3) The soldier and dog missing the pressure-IED... Someone up the ranks looks bad
4) Five soldiers tragic death.... Sequential IEDs killing the rescued and rescuers...
5) Pharmacy Road... Seems like 2 Rifles is on a suicide mission...
My hunch is that part of your story underscored the futility of the 2 Rifles assignment... Thanks again for keeping us informed.
Keep safe,
Pete
Big deal that she said that. Why zero in on that one remark, the likes of which we see by the gazillion on US blogs about the US military mostly ever in complete iginorance of British or international Forces there. Any one-off mention like this of British troops or any unique expression of pride in them in that respect is instantly dismissed by a Yank as essentially obnoxious (or by others as MOD trolling). Fairly typical.
You mean like you did?
"Any one-off mention like this of British troops or any unique expression of pride in them in that respect is instantly dismissed by a Yank as essentially obnoxious"
So, you missed the very large number of comments here praising British troops, both from the British and the "Yanks"?
We welcome Michael’s thorough reporting of the work of British forces and we have no objection to his recent piece entitled "Bad Medicine". All journalists embedding with the UK military are given access to troops without censorship. However all materials coming out of theatre is checked to ensure that key tactical details that would aid the enemy are not being made public. Michael’s dispatch was subject to these checks and was given the go-ahead.
This was posted by the MOD. You can find a copy at www.blogs.mod.uk
Are you calling Michael a Liar?
This does not seem to be the character of the man that many have come to know through his reporting. Just because you gave him the go-ahead at one command level does not mean a higher command did not make this request for him leave. If you did not request him to leave then please make a strong public request for him to return soon. He seems to have the character to accept your request of returning in the near future.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/man-who-sold-iraq-war-now-vetting-embedded-journos-report.html
"The specific problem for me was that MoD cut off the embed with zero warning and no chance for me to prepare. … MoD is giving the reason that my long stay is prompting uproar among journalists who cannot get embed slots. I’ve embedded longer in Iraq with combat troops, for instance, than any journalist of any sort. I don’t buy their backpedalling now that this is public, but even if they are being truthful the truth itself is lame reason to stop me embed. There is no journalist in the U.K. or the U.S. who spends more time in combat. It’s silly to lump me in with the war-tourist sorts who come here for a month or two (usually a week or two). Among those who do come, most rarely if ever go on true combat missions to see what our lads are dealing with."
It seems like the MODs explanation is correct, at least technically. That doesn't make their decision any less stupid, though, and I'm sure that there are just hundreds of reporters from the Times and the Telegraph who are itching to zoom out to FOB Jackson so that they can tab around with 2RIFLES just like Mr. Yon. The immersive, high-quality reporting that we've seen come out of the British press should make that evident to everyone.
Some REMF PAO needs to be posted to Brunei for this one. Seriously. Either this is stupidity on a monumental scale or the MOD is trying to keep the British public from learning the reality of conditions in Helmand, in which case the public is going to have to make do with stories written at a distant remove from the fighting.
I hope this can be worked out.
"chosen to characterise it as such" - MOD says.
"it" would be.......?
Michael, they probably want you out of the way so Arabella can come visit for a few days.
Excuse my cynicism.
My son is an infantryman with 5/2 SBCT in Kandahar. His battalion has suffered 7 KIA in less than a month since they deployed there, including 4 dead yesterday in what I would guess to be a planned ambush of their rapid response to the Kandahar City car bombings. I'm frankly a little tired of hearing exclusively about the bravery of the British and Canadians, or even the Marines and Special Forces. There are many brave men risking their lives in what is now major combat in Southern Afghanistan.
God Bless you. Keep Safe. Trust the path you are on. Thank you.
Yon's reports on the war have been fantastic, but this one is beyond the pale. This was a bonehead stunt that makes me wonder what was Yon thinking. Perhaps he just no longer cares about following the rules of reporting as an embed and wants to make a name for himself as a "maverick"
Those of you who think its perfectly fine for Yon to print info like this should think twice. If an Afghani was found with those photos on his person he'd be promptly shipped to Gitmo.
"In the live broadcast, Rivera told his photographer to aim the camera at the sand in front of him. Rivera then outlined a map of Iraq, and showed the relative location of Baghdad and his location with the 101st Airborne. He then showed where the 101st would be going next. "
I ran across this link do you think it may have anything to do with what occurred? Who knows who is using it...
http://townhall.com/news/politics-elections/2009/08/31/us_officials_cancel_contract_to_profile_reporters
He claims that it costs him $1,000 per day to be here in Helmand... On what? We provide him with bed in our plush tented accom, feed him 3 square meals a day and he travels with the units he is embedded with! Between embeds he does travel around Afghanistan on a friend's private jet, maybe this is where all his readers' donations go?!
I have personally witnessed the Media Ops team here at Camp Bastion (all TWO of them) bend over backwards to look after him; driving him about, carrying his kit and chasing around after his missing FedEx packages. Not once have I seen him thank them! When he does not get what he wants he is rude and aggressive.
I am a serving officer in Afghanistan, but by no means a 'cheerleader' for the MOD!
As I said, we (those of us who can be bothered) enjoyed reading Michael's pieces.
But I witnessed him being rude and aggressive towards those whose job it is to make his embed run as smoothly as possible. They are the 'fixers' not the policy-makers.. . Doing their job as best they can and dedicated a disproportionat e amount of time looking after Michael, who never once said 'thank you'.
"Manners Maketh Man!"
"There has been some recent discussion online about reporter Michael Yon's embed with British Forces in Afghanistan and speculation over why it ended.
"Michael Yon’s embed with British forces has not been cancelled and we are disappointed that he has chosen to characterise it as such. We have hosted Michael with British forces for five weeks, some two weeks longer than originally planned.
"We welcome Michael’s thorough reporting of the work of British forces and we have no objection to his recent piece entitled "Bad Medicine". All journalists embedding with the UK military are given access to troops without censorship. However all materials coming out of theatre is checked to ensure that key tactical details that would aid the enemy are not being made public. Michael’s dispatch was subject to these checks and was given the go-ahead.
"Posted at 01:31 PM"
Someone told him to go. Based on my experinece at parsing the language used by my government, I see that the closest MOD comes to explaining why Michael had to leave was to say: "some two weeks longer than originally planned." I read that as: "We got tired of him and told him to go."
And it's always good to go on the attack: "disappointed that he has chosen to characterise it as such." Meaning "We really are good guys and look what he's done."
Seems you spent an inordinate amount of time following around Michael's fixers/handlers to know he NEVER said thank you. Their job was to make the embed run smoothly for who? I have been a serving officer in combat as well and was way too busy to do what you seem to have done. I respect your service as I do all those who are in that hellhole and hope you get out soon, along with everyone else. It is a waste of blood and money.
Your question: He claims that it costs him $1,000 per day to be here in Helmand... On what?
I am sad that you are not smart enough to figure that out or maybe you just want to vent a little:
Just a guess or two here from reading years of Mr. Yon’s work.
Combat Insurance…what do you think that cost? You don’t pay it Capt. Jo so you don’t think about it.
Medical Insurance….what do you think that cost for an injury that happens in a war zone? You don’t pay that either Capt. Jo so you don’t think about it. If Yon is injured for life…who pays for it…not the VA.
Body Amour….vest, helmet, glasses, gloves, boots….Oh Capt Jo you get yours free, so you don’t think about that.
The phone bill/ sat bill to transmit data….that can not be ensure to be available by the military…in a timely matter. Something else you don’t pay for Capt. Jo, so you don’t think about it.
For the camera and lens that are used to shot the great pictures…I think the camera body is 3 to 5k and camera lens can be the same if not more. But again Capt. Jo you don’t think about that either.
There is a web site so there has to be some kind of office support, backend support. There is some extra cost there as well, but Capt. Jo all of your support services are taken care of….so you don’t think about that cost either.
Capt. Jo you get all of the above and a pay check. Capt. Jo you just keep thinking about those free meals and a place to sleep. Let the enlisted do the deep thinking!
This is how you are received by some members of the UK defence community http://www.pprune.org/military-aircrew/387486-new-michael-yon-dispatch-afghanistan.html
You are held in the highest regard by many in the UK. Keep up the great work!!
RSS