Guest Authors

DOD Background: operations Involving Osama Bin Laden

03 May 2011

From the Pentagon

DOD Background Briefing with Senior Defense Officials from the Pentagon and Senior Intelligence Officials by telephone on U.S. operations Involving Osama Bin Laden

MR. GEOFF MORRELL (Pentagon Press Secretary):  We have -- we're trying to get in on the phone a couple of our colleagues.  This will be their placard, senior intelligence officials.  So anyway, thank you guys for coming to join us.  We don't have much time because one of our briefers here has another event to attend to, in fact, involving the Pakistanis later on this afternoon here at the building.

So without further ado, why don't we go to our two senior Defense officials who will talk to you guys on background for the next half-hour.  And let me turn it over to our gentleman here who can speak -- who has a little bit of updated information to provide you all.

SR. DEFENSE OFFICIAL:  OK, I'm going to read from a statement.

Today's religious rites were conducted for the deceased on the deck of the USS Carl Vinson, which is located in the North Arabian Sea.  Preparations for at-sea burial began at 1:10 a.m. Eastern Standard Time and were completed at 2:00 a.m. Eastern Standard Time.

Traditional procedures for Islamic burial were followed.  The deceased's body was washed and then placed in a white sheet.  The body was placed in a weighted bag, a military officer read prepared religious remarks, which were translated into Arabic by a native speaker.  After the words were complete, the body was placed on a prepared flat board, tipped up, whereupon the deceased body eased into the sea.

MR. MORRELL:  So that's our update from here.

If we have our telephone connection, I want to turn it over to our senior intelligence official who's joining us and who can provide additional updates on their perspective this morning.

SR. INTELLIGENCE OFFICIAL:  Good morning.  Can you hear us?

MR. MORRELL:  Yeah, (briefer name deleted), we can hear you.

SR. INTELLIGENCE OFFICIAL:  Fantastic.  I'm going to turn it over to my [other senior intelligence official] colleague.

SR. INTELLIGENCE OFFICIAL:  Yes, I would just like to give an update on the confidence level and the basis for the confidence level that -- the identification of Osama bin Laden.  First, he was visually identified on the scene by those who conducted the raid.  Also on the scene, one of the women on the compound who we assessed to be one of his wives identified him by name as Osama bin Laden.  CIA specialists compared photos of the body to known photos of bin Laden last evening, and were able to determine with 95-percent certainty that the body was Osama bin Laden.  And finally, this morning, CIA and other specialists in the intelligence community performed the initial DNA analysis matching a virtually 100-percent DNA match of the body against DNA of several bin Laden family members.

An additional update on materials, quite a bit of materials that were found at the sight and collected:  Those materials are currently being exploited and analyzed.  And a task force is being set up at CIA to conduct that task, given the volume of materials collected at the raid site.

SR. INTELLIGENCE OFFICIAL:  That's the latest update.  Where would you like to go from here, Geoff?

MR. MORRELL:  Let's start over here, if we could.  Why don't we get -- Lita, do you have anything?

Q:  Yes.  Can you tell us a little bit about whether or not any other people were taken, either, alive out of the compound?  Is there is any -- anyone being held, any detainees or anything?

And then just overall, can you give us your assessment of what this means in terms of al-Qaida and other terrorist organizations, particularly the affiliates who have been operating much more independently from al-Qaida core lately?

SR. DEFENSE OFFICIAL:  Pardon me.  No detainees were taken.  And this was a significant blow to al-Qaida, but as the president said last night, the job of disrupting, dismantling and defeating the al-Qaida network continues.  And I would defer to my Defense colleague and my [senior Intelligence official] colleague for additional information.

SR. DEFENSE OFFICIAL:  I would just underscore what the president said again, which is that this sends a -- should send a signal to every member of al-Qaida and every affiliate of not only U.S. resolve but U.S. capability to bring those who have killed Americans, killed other innocents, to -- our ability to bring them to justice.

MR. MORRELL:  David.

Q:  Last night could be described as -- well, let me put it this way.  It has been reported that this was a kill operation, that there was no intention to capture Osama bin Laden even if he came out with his hands up.  Last night, you said that he had resisted, but you didn't specify what the resistance was.  What was the resistance that the American team met in that compound?

SR. DEFENSE OFFICIAL:  The American team engaged in a firefight, and as indicated last night, Osama bin Laden did resist.  I would add, however, that he had been living in a mansion that was eight times the size of any other structure in the neighborhood, living rather comfortably.  He and some other male combatants on the target appeared to use -- certainly did use women as shields.

And then I would like to correct your first point.  The principal focus of the operation was to and sole focus of the operation was to kill or capture Osama bin Laden.  But there were certainly capture contingencies, as there must be.

Q:  (Off mic.)

SR. DEFENSE OFFICIAL:  I'm not going to provide those operational details.

Q:  But as you say, how did he resist then, refused to get up off his chair or --

MR. MORRELL:  Mik -- (inaudible) -- if the point of this discussion is to try to go into operational details of this mission, it's going to be a very short discussion.  So we're just not going to -- we're not going to go into operational details.  So if --

Q:  But if it was a kill-or-capture mission, why is it that he was killed?

MR. MORRELL:  I think he's spoken to this as far as he wants to speak to it.  He said he resisted.

Q:  (Inaudible.)

MR. MORRELL:  Tom Bowman.

Q:  Could we get -- into where he was found?  He was in this million-dollar mansion a short distance from the Pakistani military facility.  What does that tell you about what the Pakistanis knew or didn't know?  Do you believe that they were aware he was there or were easily duped?  What's your sense of it?

SR. DEFENSE OFFICIAL:  I would defer to our intelligence colleague on that.

SR. DEFENSE OFFICIAL:  (Off mic) -- indications that the Pakistanis were aware that Osama bin Laden was at the Abbottabad compound.

MR. MORRELL:  (Briefer name deleted), sorry, we picked you up a little late there.  Can you repeat that so we can hear the whole sentence?

SR. DEFENSE OFFICIAL:  My apologies.  You know, we have no indications that the Pakistanis were aware that Osama bin Laden was at the compound in Abbottabad.

MR. MORRELL:  I think he answered the question.  There’s no indication he was aware.

Yeah, David -- I'm sorry – Craig.

Q:  Can you clarify -- do you know for certain that bin Laden was killed by U.S. bullets, or could he have been killed by his own people?  In the past, he's instructed his bodyguards to shoot him if there was a raid to try and capture him.  And was an autopsy conducted?

SR. DEFENSE OFFICIAL:  I'll defer to our intelligence colleague on the last portion, but he was killed by U.S. bullets.

SR. INTELLIGENCE OFFICIAL:  I'm sorry.  We didn't hear the last part of the question.  My apologies.

MR. MORRELL:  Autopsy, (briefer name deleted)?

(Briefer name deleted), the question was, was there an autopsy performed?

SR. INTELLIGENCE OFFICIAL:  We're going to have to get back to you on that one.  We need to check the facts there.

MR. MORRELL:  David Cloud.

Q:  Can you give us the justification for burying him at sea?  I think I can assume it, but I'd like to hear it from you.  And also, will anything be done to this mansion in Pakistan?

SR. DEFENSE OFFICIAL:  The justification for burial at sea is when there is no land alternative.  And as -- according to Islamic teachings and practice, deceased must be buried with proper procedures within 24 hours.  And that was the basis for that decision.

Q:  Why was that -- (off mic) -- following exactly?  Did you not want him to become -- did you -- obviously, one fear must have been that wherever he was buried would become a place that would attract militants or some other concern.

SR. DEFENSE OFFICIAL:  There was no available alternative in terms of a country that was willing to accept the body, and we took pains to ensure that we were compliant with Muslim tradition and law, and sought to dispose of the body, using the appropriate procedures and rituals, within 24 hours.

Q:  (Off mic) -- the body?

SR. DEFENSE OFFICIAL:  I'm not going to go into the background details of those conversations.

MR. MORRELL:  Yeah, go ahead.

Q:  A question for the senior intelligence officials.  We were told last night that, obviously, this operation had been going on for some time, several years, tracking some of these couriers.

Can you talk a little bit more broadly about the hunt over the past 10 years?  We have been told over time that the trail had gone cold on bin Laden.  Number one, is that true?  And can you give us sort of a -- not a blow by blow, but sort of go back to 2001, take us to now and talk through the 10 years, how difficult it was.  Was there a point where there was very little intelligence?  I think that would be helpful.

MR. MORRELL:  All right.  That will be our last question, then.

SR. INTELLIGENCE OFFICIAL:  All right.  I think we can walk through that with colleague here very briefly.

The CIA's hunt for Osama bin Laden had been relentless since September 11th, 2001.  Prior to our coming across this compound in August of 2010, precise locational information on bin Laden's whereabouts hadn't been known for several years.  That being said, we did collect information over time that helped form a picture that, once we came across this compound, enabled us to move swiftly on the intelligence case.

Now, as you know, intelligence cases aren't necessarily built overnight, and it did take time and several months and, you know, vetting of our information to ensure that, you know, we had the highest possible confidence in the information at our disposal.  And once the CIA was comfortable -- and, of course, other intelligence agencies and, of course, the president and his national security team were heavily involved in reviewing the intelligence case.  And at the end of the day, they made a bold decision to move on a very strong intelligence case that was built up by CIA along with our partners in the intelligence community such as the NSA and NGA.

SR. DEFENSE OFFICIAL:  Let me just add -- the president's role in this should not be underestimated.  I think there was a body of intelligence that was brought forward to him and his team, as was described, but in the final weeks and really months of this, his personal interest and direction and attention pushed the case to a new level that enabled real action.  And I think that role is quite important.

MR. MORRELL:  (Briefer name deleted), we have your slides available should you want to speak to them.  Just give me your word, and we can pass those out if you want to -- if you want to deal with that.

SR. INTELLIGENCE OFFICIAL:  (Off mic) -- hand those out.  I'll briefly describe the visuals -- and I don't mean to take much more time.  I know we're running low.

But there is a line diagram of the Abbottabad compound, which I think is highly instructive of how much focus there was on operational security.  The walls around the compound were up to 18 feet high.  The balconies had seven-feet-high privacy walls.  There were, in addition to wall heights, barbed wire along the top of the walls.  The residents of the compound burned their own trash.  There were two gates at the compound, as well, and opaque windows.

So once we came across this compound, we paid close attention to it because it became clear that whoever was living here was trying to maintain a very discreet profile and was practicing a great deal of operational security, and, you know, the compound was designed to obscure lines of sight from multiple directions.  That's a very important point.

The line diagram, just to lay it out very briefly, shows two main buildings:  a three-story building, and then a smaller building toward the bottom of the -- what I'll call the triangle, if you will.  And we believe that Osama bin Laden and his family were living on the second and third floors of the main -- the main buildings, and two other families resided in the other building and on the first floor of the bin Laden building.  So that's one of the graphics that might be useful.

We also have photos of -- from aerial shots of the Abbottabad compound, and you can see the plot of land that it's built on, and that was in 2004, and then finally post-construction in 2011.

One thing I would note about the compound is that Abbottabad has grown a little bit since 2004, and that this compound, about one acre in size, is, you know, unlike most other residences in the Abbottabad area; much grander scale, valued at approximately $1 million.

The -- you know, Abbottabad is approximately 35 miles northeast -- slightly northeast of Islamabad.  And we believe that -- bear with me just a second, a technical issue here -- (pause) -- five years.

(Pause.)

MR. MORRELL:  Are you back?

SR. INTELLIGENCE OFFICIAL:  No, that's it.

MR. MORRELL:  Terrific.  Let's go Barbara.

Q:  Can your senior intelligence official or yourself -- can you tell the world anything about the last moments alive of Osama bin Laden?  Did he die peacefully?  Did he die violently?  Can you tell us anything about his last moments?

SR. INTELLIGENCE OFFICIAL:  He died during a firefight, Barbara.

Q:  Did Osama bin Laden actually use a female as a human shield himself?  And what does that mean?  Was he holding somebody?  And also, the family members who survived, were they -- are they being interrogated right now by the Pakistanis?  And also, the wife who identified him, did she do so under duress?  Is this the youngest wife, as we've heard about?  Or did she offer up his name quite readily?

SR. INTELLIGENCE OFFICIAL:  I don't know if -- we're not going to get into that kind of detail; that would go to the operational specifics.  I don't know if my Defense colleagues have a different view.

MR. MORRELL:  We concur.

Q:  If you can -- any follow-up on what was said?

Q:  (Off mic) -- human shield -- human shield part.

Q:  You know, what did he say?  Did he say, you've got me?  Did -- anything?

MR. MORRELL:  Julian Barnes?

Q:  Can you talk a little bit about the coordination with Pakistan?  When precisely were they told about this mission?  Did this mission, if you can say, launch from Afghanistan or Pakistan?  And more broadly, what does this mean for U.S.-Pakistan relations?  Is this -- has an irritant been removed?  Or is now there going to be more distrust now since he was hiding in a populated area?

SR. DEFENSE OFFICIAL:  Since this is a unilateral U.S. operation because of its importance for the nation and our concern about operational security, we did not notify any of our counterterrorism partners in advance.

Once the raid was successfully completed and U.S. personnel were safe, we did immediately call our Pakistani counterparts at multiple levels.  I think the White House has told you that the president called President Zardari.  Other calls were made to others, including General Kayani.  And so we -- those were among the first international calls made to let people know of the operation.

I think -- and to the broader point about cooperation, I think that, you know, since 9/11, in some areas, Pakistan has been quite a steadfast partner in counterterrorism.  We appreciate, for example, the positive statement that came from their Foreign Ministry today.

In other areas, that cooperation has not been what we would like it to be, and we continue to have a very candid conversation with the Pakistanis about what more we can and should be doing together to deal with this common challenge.

Q:  Was there a worry that Pakistani forces could kind of rush to this compound in the middle of this raid since they obviously didn't know what was going on, and there could be a friendly fire incident?

SR. DEFENSE OFFICIAL:  Again, I think our focus was on operational security and ensuring this could be done with success and without interruption.

(Cross talk.)

Q:  Can you tell us where the financing came from for this compound and for his being able to keep himself with family and an entourage at this location and whether you recovered any assets such as computers and so forth at the scene?

MR. MORRELL:  As our intelligence source, would you care to take those on?

SR. INTELLIGENCE OFFICIAL:  I'm sorry, Geoff.  We couldn't hear.  My apologies.  What was the question?

MR. MORRELL:  Well, there's two questions.  One was about the financing to provide for this compound.  The second one was site -- any -- anything taken from the site, including computers.  I think you addressed that a little bit in your opening statement already.

SR. INTELLIGENCE OFFICIAL:  Right.  The -- on the -- on materials that were collected there, I think we're not going to get into specifics at this point, but it is a robust collection of materials that, you know, we need to -- need to -- need to sift through.  And you know, we hope to find valuable intelligence that will lead us to other players in al-Qaida.

I'll defer to my colleague on the other questions.

SR. DEFENSE OFFICIAL:  Okay.  I think our assessment is that given the value of this -- that is, to speak directly to your question, we don't know how this compound was financed, but key to our assessment of its importance and its importance to al-Qaida was the fact that we assessed that given other intelligence indicating the organization is having financial difficulties, that they would only spend the amount of money to finance this compound and continue to maintain this compound for only probably two of its most senior commanders, that being bin Laden or Zawahiri.  And the intelligence led us to conclude it was bin Laden.

SR. INTELLIGENCE OFFICIAL:  It's worth bearing mind that, you know, he was more or less hiding in plain sight, in that many of his terrorist associates in other parts of Pakistan and throughout the region are living in much more dire conditions.  So you have to be wondering what they're thinking at this moment when they see that their leader was living, relatively speaking, high on the hog, and they're, you know, living in other places that aren't -- that are more remote and not as nice as this city northeast of Islamabad.

Q:  Did U.S. intelligence ever put eyes on Osama bin Laden in this process?

SR. INTELLIGENCE OFFICIAL:  We're not going to get into the specifics at this point about that.

Q:  In the training for the mission, did you build a whole, like, fake compound modeled after this in the U.S. for training?

SR. DEFENSE OFFICIAL:  I don't want to get into details, but I will say that preparations were extensive.  A full range of options -- given the critical importance of the target, a full range of options were considered, and I'll leave it that.

Q:  Can I ask you -- can you confirm that it was a [Navy] SEAL team?  And was this a specially designated team that had been practicing or reviewing intelligence for a while and they were the unit of choice?

SR. DEFENSE OFFICIAL:  Not going to comment on units or numbers.  I will say a small U.S. team of special operators and leave it at that.

MR. MORRELL:  And to Dan De Luce .

Q:  Go ahead.  Today I have no questions.

MR. MORRELL:  OK.

Chris Lawrence.

Q: I just had a question.  Seeing -- looking at the diagram about the walls and things like that, but -- how much did you know about the personnel that were in the compound at the time in terms of manpower, in terms of the weapons they were -- they were in possession of?  In other words, did the assault team have a clear idea of exactly what sort of resistance they would face?

And the second question is -- they were in there for 40 minutes.  Was Osama bin Laden killed near the beginning of that 40 minutes or was it near the end of that time?

SR. DEFENSE OFFICIAL:  I'll answer the latter part of that and then defer to my intelligence colleague.  He was killed toward the latter part of that time.  (Pause.)  Not precisely.

MR. MORRELL:  (Briefer name deleted) -- hold on.  (Briefer name deleted), did you hear?  The question you're deferring is, did -- what resistance did we expect.  Is that, (briefer name deleted), what you're deferring?

SR. INTELLIGENCE OFFICIAL:  Yes, the manpower and the weapons.

SR. INTELLIGENCE OFFICIAL:  Yeah, understanding of --

MR. MORRELL:  Of what would be inside the compound.

SR. DEFENSE OFFICIAL:  -- what was inside the compound.

MR. MORRELL:  (Briefer name deleted), do you care to speak to what we knew of the resistance we would face inside the compound, based upon intelligence?

SR. INTELLIGENCE OFFICIAL:  There wasn't perfect visibility on everything inside the compound, but we did have a very, you know, good understanding of the residents who were there, in terms of the number there and in terms of, you know, who, you know, the males were and the women and children.  And, you know, over time, we were able to identify a family at the compound that, you know, in terms of numbers, squared with the number of bin Laden family members we thought were probably living with him in Pakistan.

SR. DEFENSE OFFICIAL:  The intelligence support was superb.  The operators who assaulted the compound felt they had all the intelligence they needed, and they were highly confident in their ability to carry out the mission.

Q:  Can you explain --

MR. MORRELL:  Luis Martinez.

Q:  The helicopter that went down, how did that complicate the mission?  Did it complicate it significantly?  And were you able to get everyone onboard other helicopters in addition to the one you were just talking about?

SR. DEFENSE OFFICIAL:  No U.S. personnel were injured; all U.S. personnel successfully extracted.  When one does these complex operations, you prepare for a variety of contingencies.  The assault force prepared for those, and the operation went as planned.

(Cross talk.)

MR. MORRELL:  Missy Ryan.

Q:  I'd just like to ask if you can speak to any sort of immediate effect that you would expect for -- on the Afghan insurgency and the campaign across the border in Afghanistan.

And also, just to clarify, when you say -- when we say that it's a -- it was a unilateral U.S. action, does that mean that the reports about Pakistani intelligence or observers being present are false?

SR. DEFENSE OFFICIAL:  Let me defer to my intelligence colleague on that.

Q:  Thank you.

SR. INTELLIGENCE OFFICIAL:  If you can hear me, you know, the intelligence on this compound was shared with no one outside of the U.S. government; and in fact, you know, only a small group of people inside the government were aware.

The Pakistanis, you know, did not know of our interest in the compound, but they did provide us information that helped us develop a clearer focus on this compound over time.  So they were not aware of our interest in this compound, but they provided us information attached to it to help us complete the robust intelligence case that, you know, eventually carried the day.

SR. DEFENSE OFFICIAL:  As my Department of Defense colleague said, it was a unilateral operation.

Q:  (Off mic.)

Q:  Can I just follow up?  On the 40-minute --

MR. MORRELL:  Tom, excuse me.

SR. DEFENSE OFFICIAL:  Yeah.

Q:  The first part of the question was the impact on the Afghan insurgency, the Afghan campaign.

Q:  Who's at fault in the 40-minute -- you said he was killed in the last 40-minute operation.  Presumably, he was hiding; you had to root him out.  Can you just talk a little bit about how he was found?

SR. DEFENSE OFFICIAL:  Well, as my intelligence colleague said, if you look at the line diagram on the last page, there were four military adult males killed on the compound, including Osama bin Laden.  Two of those lived in the other compound you see toward the bottom of the picture, and one -- and then on -- in the first floor.

The bin Laden family was on the second and third floor.  And so, without getting into operational details, those areas were cleared last.

Q:  So presumably there was a lot of ruckus going on.  He would just -- obviously, they didn't come out.  If you were there for 40 minutes, I would guess you're running through the compound and --

MR. MORRELL:  I think he -- I think he's explained why --

Q:  -- burst in and got him in the room, right?

SR. DEFENSE OFFICIAL:  Yeah, I think --

MR. MORRELL:  Al.

Q:  Yeah, two things.  On the burial at sea, was there an imam or a Muslim chaplain present for that?  And on the intel piece, what does this say about the value of continuing to interrogate detainees long after they've been captured?  Was it that sort of information that led down this road?

SR. DEFENSE OFFICIAL:  I'll defer to my intelligence colleague on that last portion.  As I indicated in my statement, a military officer read prepared religious remarks, which were translated into Arabic by a native speaker, and all Islamic teachings and procedures -- (inaudible) -- procedures for Islamic burial were followed.

Q:  But there was --

MR. MORRELL:  Anna Mulrine.

Q:  Wait, I -- there was another question, too, that he deferred.

MR. MORRELL:  Okay, yeah, I'm sorry.  We did defer that.  (Briefer name deleted), the question we deferred.

SR. INTELLIGENCE OFFICIAL:  (Off mic) -- multiple sources of intelligence, you know, that led us to where we are today with respect to this compound.  Key information was gleaned from detainees.  And that detainee reporting provided insights into the bin Laden courier network.  And so it did -- it did contribute, you know, to the intelligence case.  But it was by no means the only bit of information.  We had other sources -- I can't describe those -- that helped with the final intelligence picture.

Q:  (Off mic) -- been held for a long time before this nugget of info came out that was so useful?

SR. INTELLIGENCE OFFICIAL:  Can you repeat the question, please?

Q:  Was the detainee who came up with this nugget of information on the courier network -- had that person been detained for a long time before and interrogated for a long time before that came out?

SR. INTELLIGENCE OFFICIAL:  It was multiple detainees debriefed over a number of years, and then it was a composite picture of the courier network and this particular courier that we were interested -- that led us to this compound, that came out of that composite picture and then was developed further through other intelligence means.

Q:  Can you talk a little bit about the resistance that the special operators encountered when they -- when they first arrived at the compound?  I mean, did bin Laden have guards on duty?  I mean, did they -- kind of did the firing begin immediately, or was there some element of surprise involved?

And then I'm also wondering if there will be a reward for the information leading to bin Laden's capture.  Are detainees eligible for monetary -- (inaudible)?

SR. DEFENSE OFFICIAL:  I will defer to my intelligence colleague on the last part.

On the first part, through most of the 40 minutes during which U.S. special operators were on the compound, they were engaged in a firefight and successive clearing of the -- it was  very deliberate.  But for most of the period there, there was a firefight.

MR. MORRELL:  This gentleman here.

Q:  (Off mic) -- the USS Carl Vinson when --

MR. MORRELL:  I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry.  (on this question)  (Briefer name deleted) -- (inaudible) -- reward portion of this?

SR. INTELLIGENCE OFFICIAL:  Yeah, I mean, I -- what I would say, you know, to reiterate what my colleague said, is that multiple detainees provided us information and that it's impossible to point to a single person who put us on the trail of Osama bin Laden.  You know, I'm not in a position to speak to rewards.

MR. MORRELL:  Okay.  I'm sorry.  Yes.

Q:  Two questions.  One, where was the USS Carl Vinson when the burial took place?

SR. DEFENSE OFFICE:  In the North Arabian Sea.

Q:  North Arabian Sea.  And the other question is, you said a lot of material was taken from the compound.  What kind of material was taken?

MR. MORRELL:  Sorry, but they don't want to get any more specific than they have.

Okay, I think now we're getting more rather than fewer questions.  Let's take two last ones, Justin and this gentleman in the purple.

Q:  Justin: Do you plan to release any proof of death, such as images or video of the burial?  And why haven't you done that yet?

(Pause.)

MR. MORRELL:  Are you still there?

SR. INTELLIGENCE OFFICIAL:  Yeah.  I'm sorry, we broke up again.  My apologies, Geoff.

MR. MORRELL:  The question was about images from the burial itself.

Q:  Proof of death.

MR. MORRELL:  Proof of death.

SR. INTELLIGENCE OFFICIAL:  I think we need to take that question and get back to both.

MR. MORRELL:  I said this gentleman here.  Yes.

Q:  Who actually performed the rituals, the cleaning of his body?  Were they American service members?  And why all this for a fellow who most of the world determined was not a very good Muslim anyway?  And was in fact a cold blooded killer?

MR. MORRELL:  I don't think we care to get into those details.

So Chris -- yeah.

Q:  How much do you know about what caused the mechanical problem on that one helicopter?  Is that something you would investigate to prevent future mishaps?

SR. DEFENSE OFFICIAL:  We -- for these operations, we do extensive hot washes afterwards to look at every aspect of the operation, do what we can improve for next time, and we will certainly look at that.  But as I emphasized earlier, the problem that was encountered did not impede the operation in any way.

Q:  (Off mic.)

MR. MORRELL:  I don't think we're going to go into that.

Phil?

Q:  So were they all the same kind?  So what kind of helicopter crashed?  And were all the helicopters of the same flavor for this operation?

SR. DEFENSE OFFICIAL:  I'm not going to go into details on that.

Q:  I'm just curious.  Earlier it was said that once U.S. personnel were safe, Pakistani officials were notified.  Does that imply that we penetrated Pakistan airspace without them knowing it?

MR. MORRELL:  I think it speaks to itself – yeah --go ahead.

Q:  That is what was said.  They -- (inaudible) --

MR. MORRELL:  I think it's --

Q:  You came to learn about it August 2010.  It took you around 10 months to kill him.  Was it, doing this, get any risk of repeat of Tora Bora, when he would escape from the hideout?

SR. DEFENSE OFFICIAL:  Go to (briefer name deleted).

MR. MORRELL:  (Briefer name deleted), can you understand the question?

SR. INTELLIGENCE OFFICIAL:  He might depart.  Yes, I mean, I think the answer was -- you know, is yes.  We were, you know, concerned that -- first of all, we weren't certain in August of 2010 that bin Laden was there.  We hadn't developed the complete intelligence picture to that point.

Earlier this year, our confidence level grew much higher.  And so, you know, as is the case, you know, with trying to find anyone, you know, you do worry that they may not be there when you arrive.  But, you know, we developed good information on how life at the compound, you know, was carried out, and, you know, we were very confident at the end of the day that, you know, we had bin Laden identifiable at this compound and that he would most likely be at the compound when the raid was undertaken.

MR. MORRELL:  (Briefer name deleted) I think we have exhausted everything we have over here for now.  If you have -- unless you have something else you want to add, I think we'll wrap it up.

Q:  (Off mic.)

MR. MORRELL:  Let me just -- let me defer to my friend (briefer name deleted) here.  (Briefer name deleted), anything on your end?

SR. INTELLIGENCE OFFICIAL:  Yeah, just very briefly, Geoff, if you don't mind.  You know, this CIA-U.S. military operation obviously was a major success, and it's a sign of the tremendous partnership that has existed between the intelligence community and the military in the years since 9/11.  And it's a testament that the CIA's immensely grateful to those in the military who participated in this operation and have our enduring gratitude.

We understand that the -- that the fight against al-Qaida continues, and that fight continues even as we mark the loss of Osama bin Laden.

MR. MORRELL:  Mike -- (off mic).

Q:  (Off mic) -- was anyone who was in the compound when the operation began -- did anyone survive the operation?  And if so, what happened to them?

SR. DEFENSE OFFICIAL:  Oh, yes.  There were several women and children on the compound.  One woman, who was used as a human shield by one of the four military-age males on the compound, was killed; he was firing behind her.  Two women, including one with Osama bin Laden, were wounded.  And the rest were not injured at all.  The noncombatants were moved to a safe location at the end of the operation, as the damaged helicopter was detonated, to ensure their safety.  And I think I've covered it.

MR. MORRELL:  (Inaudible.)

Q:  But where are they now?

SR. DEFENSE OFFICIAL:  They were left -- they were left on the compound.

Q:  What's the -- (off mic)?

MR. MORRELL:  OK.  Thank you.  Thank you.  Thank you all very much, and I apologize to our intelligence reporters who couldn't chime in via the phone connection, but glad you guys could hear it nonetheless.

[Go to http://go.usa.gov/bUE to view “U.S. government” briefing slides associated with this transcript.]       

http://www.defense.gov/transcripts/transcript.aspx?transcriptid=4818


Comments   

 
0 # Terry Fithian 2011-05-03 04:40
Thank you Michael for your wonderful reporting and your honest and truthful reporting about our brave troops...Please keep up the great work...
Terry
Reply
 
 
0 # Jose Diaz 2011-05-03 05:00
I don't believe the story about the "Sea Burial".
I believe Osama's head is in a formaldehyde filled glass jar on a shelf next to Che Guevara's at the CIA Hq's in Langley.
Reply
 
 
0 # Sandi 2011-05-03 05:44
for sharing this helped explain alot of questions that my husband and I had. Our youngest is in the Army and in Afghanistan at this time. We are very concerned about his continued safety as retaliation could be severe.
Reply
 
 
0 # Peter W 2011-05-03 06:06
Is that what passes for journalism at DOD briefings these days?

There wasn't a single competent question amongst the dross like "who washed [poor Osama's] body?"

Talk about out of touch and out of their depth. The accusatorial tone of most media questions explains a lot about their true allegiance.
Reply
 
 
0 # Steeve S 2011-05-03 11:37
Quoting Peter W:
Is that what passes for journalism at DOD briefings these days?

There wasn't a single competent question amongst the dross like "who washed [poor Osama's] body?"

Talk about out of touch and out of their depth. The accusatorial tone of most media questions explains a lot about their true allegiance.


Like the wuestion about bin Laden's reported lack of cooperation. To paraphrase, "Why was bin Laden killed? What was his lack of cooperation? He wouldn't get up from his chair?"

Our fourth Estate: Still Commies; still trying to destroy......"t hey," bu not you, Michael, continnue to disgust me.
Reply
 
 
0 # Allan 2011-05-03 12:37
Michael: Thanks for taking the time to post this info for your readers. Be safe!
Reply
 
 
0 # Don R 2011-05-03 12:41
Thanx Mike.....finall y we have something we can believe!
Reply
 
 
0 # Drew O 2011-05-03 13:06
Q: from the Greendale Community College Journo major.
Did he die peacefully, like when my veterinarian put my dog fluffy to sleep?
A: :-| He died in a firefight, Barbie. Hush, now honey and let the grown ups talk.
Reply
 
 
0 # oatka 2011-05-03 14:08
I hope someone in the team spray-painted "9/11" on the walls.
Reply
 
 
0 # Paul 2011-05-03 14:15
And nothing at all from the left behind survivors?!? The reporters are not interested in talking to them (if they exist) and asking how they feel??? I see vagueness all through this brief. Enough for additional info leaked at later dates as appropriate.
Reply
 
 
0 # Grma214 2011-05-03 15:23
Let's not forget Mrs-Osama-the-H uman- Shield, who unfortunately also died.
Reply
 
 
0 # Realist 2011-05-03 16:01
Reuters reported it was a kill order here they state it was not there was an option to take him alive. It is starting to sound more and more as if he could have been taken alive. So based on this politics as usual took presedence over bringing this dirt bag back to Gitmo and interrogating him can you imagine the deapth of information this guy could have given us concerning global terrorism who is financing it, who are the key leaders, where are the Al Queda cells, who are the key taliban leaders are there more cells in the US. So Osama won again he was killed due to our system not having the political spirit to bring him back to gitmo, interogate him, put him through a military court and sentance him to death.
Reply
 
 
0 # woodNfish 2011-05-03 16:08
I am happy we killed bin laden, but everyone in that compound was a terrorist and we should have killed all of them.

The Pakistani's have been hiding and protecting bin laden for 10 years. They are our enemies and we should treat them as such.
Reply
 
 
0 # Samuel Dennewitz 2011-05-03 16:38
I don't believe a word of this BS. I believe it's all a very thought out and well executed ploy to keep a man in the president's seat another 4 years while he tries his best to destroy this great nation of ours!
Reply
 
 
0 # ironargonaut 2011-05-03 16:44
Interesting tidbit no one seems to have mentioned. Watch the video of Bin Laden in a room with white walls no furnishings but two windows high on the wall. Now look at the photos of this compound. Notice the double set of windows on the top floor set high in the wall. You suppose the dimensions and spacings of the windows are the same. That is pretty close to a dead ringer or am I pointing out something the Al-queda morons could not figure out and should shut up.
Reply
 
 
0 # Ted Thomas 2011-05-03 17:04
There was a military academy near the hideout. A group of helicopters approached the area in the middle of the night. The Taliban do not have copters. The US does not have carte blanche to fly around Pakistan low, at night, with fully loaded attack helicopters. Hundreds of Pakistanis have been killed in the last year by drone missiles.

1. Does Pakistan care what happens to it's future military officers?
2. Does Pakistan have any radar facilities around it's capital city (which this site was near)?
3. Has Pakistan directly told the US not to violate it's airspace w/o permission?
4. Why was this attack not an act of war against Pakistan?

There are lots of puzzle pieces which don't fit well here. I ask the questions because of what is at stake: a possible 4th war, this time with a nuclear-armed Islamic country. Are we ready for that?

Thanks, Michael, for your brave reporting. We remember that you could be a target, too.
Reply
 
 
0 # ironargonaut 2011-05-03 18:04
Ted,
1) Do we have anti-aircraft batteries at West Point?
2) Did a private pilot once land a plane on the White house lawn? Red Square.
3) We did not need their permission
4) The United Nations after 9-11 sanctioned the US hunt for Bin Laden. Therefore, it is not in contradiction to international law. Also, we did not attack the Pakistan gov't nor the Pakistan people, nor any Pakistan citizens. Bin Laden declared war on the US, he used his base in Pakistan to attack the US. Therefore, under international law it is a legitimate target.
One could logically argue that Pakistan allowing Bin Laden to wage war on the US from their soil was an act of war against the US.

There is almost zero possibility that we will have a war with Pakistan. They will act all offended but it has the same wieght as a liberal US politician claiming they are for gov't spending cuts.
Reply
 
 
0 # TheOldMan 2011-05-03 18:11
Just a tiny quibble - this was vengeance, not justice, and something I fully support. Ok it's a semantic picky point but telling for how this admin wanted to treat KSM and others. The admin has been blabbing for years about how we need to bring these bad people to justice, meaning trial, instead of locking them up for the duration or killing them outright so that the Mooselimbs would see that we are not against them, blah, blah, blah. Now the admin is crowing about how they hunted UBL down and got him.
I have nothing but admiration, respect, and pride for everyone who had anything to do with the chain of events that led to UBL's demise. No matter how small their contribution may seem, each one was a piece of the puzzle. These ops are not like the movies where the bad guys are found in weeks. It takes years of careful, step by step, cautious work.
Reply
 
 
0 # Gina 2011-05-03 18:48
Quoting Samuel Dennewitz:
I don't believe a word of this BS. I believe it's all a very thought out and well executed ploy to keep a man in the president's seat another 4 years while he tries his best to destroy this great nation of ours!

Interesting take....... I agree that he seems to be bent on destroying our country...and I agree that he's going to "milk" this, ad nauseum, to stay in office (oh GAWDD, NOOOO!) But the perhaps naive little person in me hopes, prays and believes it to be true. The sharks, etc are dispatching OBL even as we speak.
Reply
 
 
0 # Darren Stewart 2011-05-03 20:32
I confess I shall bring a little humour here.
I am outraged. The world famous Page3 of the Sun got bumped to page 19 today and had Osama Bin shithead in its place. Another strategic victory from the grave from the scum.

Cutting back from the humour - I fail to comprehend why the Allies treat these scum to Islamic social behavoural norms.
Why are you washing the scum? You're spending the past 10 years making it clear these are not muslims.
Why are you wrapping in white? You're spending the past 10 years saying these scum are not islamic.
Why are you burying this scum within a day? You're spending the past 10 years saying these scum are not islamic.

It is high time all_islamic customs and fair treatments were withdrawn, and these scum should know when they die they will rot, and not be treated to their social norms.
Reply
 
 
0 # woodNfish 2011-05-03 21:19
It may have been vengeance, but it was definitely justice by any definition.
Reply
 
 
0 # forlourned 2011-05-03 21:50
They didn't take it far enough! The "you know~" broke up the reading and drove me a little nuts, you know, on how the information was parceled out, you know, and how the actions taken in the killing of that raghead, you know :-x took place in, you know or on that compound you know~
_
You know?
Reply
 
 
0 # Naomi 2011-05-03 22:27
I don't mean to sound disrespectful, but I really am not convinced about this "killing" and burial at sea. Who can prove it? Also, don't the liberals call that an "invasion" when we go into another country we are not at war with to kill someone? Under Democrats, invasions (especially without Congressional approval) are fine; but don't let a Republican do it. If Osama is truly "gone", that's fine; but how opportune is it that it happens under Mr. Obama's watch?
Reply
 
 
0 # Tim Krebs 2011-05-03 22:32
Apparently the definition of 'COVERT' has changed. What's next, a 'Seals' Face Book page? HEY, is somebody wagging my dog?
Reply
 
 
0 # Linda Osburn 2011-05-03 23:01
You answered some questions that I had and was unable to get answers on. You are awesome Michael - please be safe, will continue to keep you and yours in our prayers!!!
Reply
 
 
0 # Simonferrer 2011-05-04 07:49
Quoting Realist:
Reuters reported it was a kill order here they state it was not there was an option to take him alive. It is starting to sound more and more as if he could have been taken alive. So based on this politics as usual took presedence over bringing this dirt bag back to Gitmo and interrogating him can you imagine the deapth of information this guy could have given us concerning global terrorism who is financing it, who are the key leaders, where are the Al Queda cells, who are the key taliban leaders are there more cells in the US. So Osama won again he was killed due to our system not having the political spirit to bring him back to gitmo, interogate him, put him through a military court and sentance him to death.


I seriously doubt that bin Laden would've given up any information of value, and all the while we held him he'd be a symbol for al Qaeda followers around the world to rally around. This way they have no martyr's grave.
Reply
 
 
0 # Simonferrer 2011-05-04 07:57
I think this was covering our bases, so that the Islamic media around the world couldn't accuse us of defiling a Muslim's corpse. The burial at sea robs them of both a martyr's grave to rally 'round and a bone of contention. Besides, he and his cronies are the ones who defile their dead victims, so should we resort to that same low behavior? I say let OBL go to Allah with all due ceremony, so that he can face judgment for his actions. If Allah is truly the compassionate and merciful as advertised, OBL may have a rude awakening coming about his welcome in paradise.
Reply
 
 
0 # bacon butties 2011-05-04 22:00
Defiling a muslim? As I stated above, the western line is one that attempts to create a false case of seperation, and to try and make a totally false state of play that terrorists and al quida and islamic nazi's are not muslims. Fine, I can go with that. But don't then cap a end level boss and then give it a muslim burial and any forms of islamic recognition.

As for any muslim outlet, news agency, or government that raises its head above the parapet in regard to claiming_that_h e_was a muslim, Knowing exactly who dares to come out can then be dealt with is exactly what is needed.

Seriously, why show these people repect? They only murder, slay and kill and follow no Geneva convention, and have great fun releasing videos of their rusty sword beheadings.

Osama Bin Laden did not deserve a funeral of any kind. There should have been a ceremonial meat mincer and feed the output to some pigs. And the more public the better.
Reply
 
 
0 # Matt 2011-05-06 01:59
So someone asks why we bothered to wash the body of a "cold blooded killer" instead of just burying him face down in a shallow grave? And you read into that and decide the guy's a pinko commie trying to destroy America?
Reply
 
 
0 # Graphics Design 2011-05-06 03:23
The assassination of Osama Bin Laden by Obama's team unilaterally within Pakistani soil is just too good. That too within a Pakistani "defense forces" town, without the knowledge of any Pakistani government/poli ce/military/ISI officials proves that - Pakistani authorities are absolutely CLUELESS & USELESS when it comes to who enters their soil - either US Navy Seals or Terrorists - how & when, how long they stay, do whatever they wish to and depart from Pakistani soil pretty easily. US Navy Seals easily hood winked all Pakistani authorities and also all pathetic Terror groups based in Pakistani soil. Both are no match to US supreme powers. Perhaps, US should colonize Pakistan and take control completely - this way US can nip the terror cells in the bud and hold Pakistani authorities accountable.
Reply
 

Add comment

Due to the large amount of spam, all comments will be moderated before publication. Please be patient if you do not see your comment right away. Registered users who login first will have their comments posted immediately.


Security code
Refresh

Reader support is crucial to this mission. Weekly or monthly recurring ‘subscription’ based support is the best, though all are greatly appreciated.  Recurring and one-time donations are available through PayPal or Authorize.net.

supp

supp

subscribe

You can now help support the next dispatch with bitcoins:

Donate Bitcoins

My BitCoin QR Code

This is for use with BitCoin apps:

189