Death in the Corn: Part III of III
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|

In five months, the crews have fired about 2,500 high explosive (HE), white phosphorous (WP) and illumination rounds through their 81mm mortars, to devastating effect. It is known that the enemy has been trying to figure a way to target the mortars in these photos, but the reality is that the enemy will likely have to keep suffering the barrages. Taliban in the open are often simply at the mercy of the mortar.
Today, a serious mission was afoot, and the mortar crews were following the progress of the infantry by constantly aiming the mortars at targets that would support the infantry as they advanced. At least one jet was overhead and also a British Apache was on station.



This was another serious fight, with some close calls for 2 Para soldiers out there on the ground. At least nine Taliban were almost certainly killed, and another was wounded. The locals reported, “Many Taliban killed.”
I was taking some notes for this dispatch when the sniper started early, firing over FOB Gibraltar for the fifth day in a row. He started early, recklessly and foolishly with about 10 shots, between about 1220 and 1225 in the afternoon. He seemed to be begging to get shot, but still nobody could see him.
04 September, 2008
That morning a dicker was watching a patrol. A British sniper had him in the crosshairs, and the rangefinder put him at 820 meters. The Taliban dicker was behind a wall, and was visible only from mid-belly up. The time was 0715 when a British sniper squeezed the trigger, launching a .338 bullet that arced to the target, striking the dicker in the neck. He fell.
Just over an hour later, another dicker, this one at about 800 meters, took a British 7.62 bullet in the buttocks. The man was dressed in black. He fell.
Incredibly, both men had survived the snipers. Locals brought the shot men to the British, who treated them as if they were wounded soldiers. Journalists are not permitted to photograph or interview captured enemy combatants, but I did ask Major Dawson if I could observe how they were being treated. Major Dawson obliged immediately. Both men were conscious and lucid. The British soldiers, the doctor and medics, were treating the prisoners diligently and respectfully, and given that my visit was on about 30 seconds’ notice, it was a candid moment.
And so a medevac helicopter was called and took one man away to be treated at the trauma center. A second helicopter came for the Taliban dressed in black. The British are dangerously short on helicopters, yet three times I saw the British call helicopters for wounded men, who in each case I thought were either Taliban or at least their allies. I boarded the helicopter with some British soldiers and the Taliban prisoner, and we roared out of FOB Gibraltar.
The story of 2 Para and 3 Para will never be fully told. But it’s obvious that they did their duties as soldiers, in so many missions that I was briefed on but have not described here, such as helping deliver the critical turbine to the Kajaki dam. Despite the bad trajectory of the war in general, there have been some stunning successes.
The British soldiers will not quit. Despite hardship and loss in Iraq when their own press veritably disowned them, the soldiers kept fighting in Iraq (there really was some serious fighting down there in Basra), and their morale was far higher than the British media would have us believe.
My first month back in Afghanistan leaves mixed impressions. Clearly we are losing and the clock is ticking. But then, we nearly lost Iraq in 2006, yet that war was turned around at the very brink of disaster. Losing doesn’t mean lost. It means try harder and try smarter. Keep slugging and keep thinking.
Days after I left FOB Gibraltar, word came that Jason Rawstron, a British soldier from 2 Para had been shot in the head and killed.
![Jason Rawstron [Photo from MoD.] Jason Rawstron [Photo from MoD.]](/images/stories/deathinthecorn3/corn--mod-grab-of-soldiera-730.jpg)
I took a moment of private silence, and later saw this:
2ND BATTALION, THE PARACHUTE REGIMENT
12TH SEPTEMBER 2008
Lieutenant Colonel Joe O’Sullivan, Commanding Officer 2 PARA paid tribute to Private Jason Rawstron on the night of his death:
Early this morning C (Bruneval) Company were conducting a patrol from their base at Forward Operating Base GIBRALTAR when they were engaged by the Taliban, and in the exchange of fire Private Jason Rawstron was killed. Jason Rawstron began his service with C (Bruneval) Company 2 PARA, and although he later moved to the Assault Engineer Platoon, it was to Bruneval Company that he returned for the Battalion’s tour in Afghanistan. Bruneval is the Parachute Regiment’s first Battle Honour, and Jason Rawstron, like all of his friends in today’s Bruneval Company and across the Battalion, was every bit the Paratrooper of that first Bruneval Company 66 years ago; tough, resourceful, fearless under the fire that he had experienced so often and never knowing defeat. He joins eleven other members of 2 PARA Battlegroup who have given their lives for their friends and what they have been asked to do in this part of Helmand. Bruneval Company and all of us in 2 PARA Battlegroup will mourn Jason Rawstron and our hearts go out to his family and friends at home. We hope that what he was, and what he and friends and his battalion stand for and have achieved in this most demanding of summers will in some small way bring them comfort at this most painful time.
Utrinque Paratus
To read the first two parts of this series:
Death in the Corn: Part I of III
Death in the Corn: Part II of III
Reader support is crucial to this mission. Weekly or monthly recurring ‘subscription’ based support is the best, though all are greatly appreciated. Recurring and one-time donations are available through PayPal or Authorize.net.
To send a check or money order:
Michael Yon
P O Box 5553
Winter Haven, FL 33880-5553
I will continue to do my part in telling the stories that are not being told. Readers must also do their part by keeping the cash flowing. Cash is essential .
Thank you!
Michael









Comments
I don't think prosperity is guaranteed to be the right answer. It's very much a western-liberal answer. The social situation could be that economic devastation is called for. Our western outlook would tend to blind us to this.
Witness Iran, where prosperity in the form of oil money has made them more virulent. Compare Iran to Chad. It doesn't matter what Chad wants because they don't have the money to do it.
Oil money isn't that different from opium money. It enables. We tend to assume it enables peace and harmony. Sometimes it enables war. What would it enable in Afghanistan?
Hat tip to them, next time you're around them, please Michael.
The British are doing a good job in tough circumstances. I appreciate their service and sacrifice.
Western media are a joke.
Keep up your good reports.
Doug Santo
Pasadena, CA, USA
Sue Osborne
Newberg OR
http://thunderrun.blogspot.com/2008/09/from-front-09222008.html
Keep up the good work. I have trouble keeping your book as I keep giving it to friends. Need to order another one again.
"The very name Pakistan inscribes the nature of the problem. It is not a real country or nation but an acronym devised in the 1930s by a Muslim propagandist for partition named Chaudhary Rahmat Ali. It stands for Punjab, Afghania, Kashmir, and Indus-Sind. The stan suffix merely means "land." In the Urdu language, the resulting acronym means "land of the pure." It can be easily seen that this very name expresses expansionist tendencies and also conceals discriminatory ones."
As much as we can try to deny it, we're going to have to expand combat operations in Afghanistan if we want to win this thing. How we'll do that without the MSM jumping on it like its Cambodia and Laos all over again, I don't know. I only hope that Petraeus somehow creates an outcome better than anyone could have ever hoped, again.
If we lose this war, we'll have more than just debt to worry about....
http://www.slate.com/id/2200134/
It didn't surprise me that it worked. From what i read from you this is all we needed all along .... to fight and have enough men to stay behind to keep the peace. Why did it surprise you .... you sound like Obama.
One small correction: he is at least COL McMaster (P); his promotion to Brigadier General, I believe, awaits Congressional approval.
Thank you for your outstanding and candid reporting. Bravo Zulu!
My thoughts are always with them.
Barry.
Hampshire.
England
Many thanks for your continued reporting and of course to are brothers in arms. We are fighting the good fight and I sincerely believe good will prevail over evil.
In my thoughts and prayers,
Randall
maybe you should mosey on over to see our 'weakness' for yourself eh?
some of us don't think ideas and discussion is a weakness; nor misguided propaganda helpful
huh? I thought he was going to ARCIC/TRADOC??? Are you sure about this?
Bob Reynolds
Proud Father
UK.
I have always wondered whether the mud fort built by Alexander the Great remains standing after the fighting of the 1980s.
It used to be a fascinating sight to see the blue eyed, red haired nomads traveling with their camel caravans.
look at the size of that meat hook
With regard to heroin cultivation,why do we not purchase the stuff at market price(whatever that may be),and then try to move forward? Perhaps the Kabul Government would not find thus in their interests?
Fine reporting-Keep your head down!
Reading the comments of girlfriends, fathers, mothers, brothers and sisters who have family fighting in Afghanistan and their reaction to your reporting is priceless and touching. Every one of your dispatches gets the same result: gratitude and thanks. Keep up the good work
Jesse, the "big guys" aren't "reporting," as traditonal (i.e. WWII & Korea) reporting implies there is an element of truth in the narratives. Without Michael and people like him, we simply wouldn't know what happens in the war zones. And, incredibly, you credit the NYT with some accurate reporting? Maybe a couple of pieces slipped by the editors, but the NYT by any definition is anti-war AND anti-military as evidenced by their giving critical information to the enemy. I'm not going to detail it here, but I could easily. Just Google it..."NYT+antiwar+tra itorous+aid & comfort to the enemy." If the NYT had been reporting during WII like they are doing now, the June 5, 1944 headline would be "ALLIES PLAN TO LAND AT NORMANDY TOMORROW MORNING!"
But, everyone has an opinion...this is mine. Great job, Michael...God be with you.
Master Chief, U.S. Navy (Ret.)
RSS feed for comments to this post