Afghanistan: When the Moon Sets, Watch Out
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|
18 September 2012

Last Friday night, the moon phase left Afghanistan in near total darkness. Even with clear skies, the enemy knew that at the brightest moment, the moon would only appear as an irrelevant orange sliver. Such times are called “red illumination,” or “red illum.” Planning calendars in Afghanistan highlight periods of red illum because they hamper aviation.
Even though this is the year 2012, and the Curiosity Rover is beaming images from Mars more than four decades after astronauts first trod on the lunar surface, the moon phase remains important when planning operations. The moment that the nighttime attack on Camp Bastion was reported, the moon phase could have been safely guessed without looking up.
In every respect, Southern Afghanistan is a dark part of the world. Without moonlight, most villages are black at night. The brightest places in the country are our bases. Cultural lights present little danger to Taliban moving at night. Our air assets, including our aerostat balloons, are often their biggest concern.
This war is mature. The enemy knows us, and we know them. After 11 years, the Taliban realizes that most helicopter traffic ceases during red illum. Most birds will only fly for urgent MEDEVAC, or for special operations. The enemy closely observes our air traffic. Operations slow under red illum, so air traffic declines, and the chances of being spotted by roving aircraft are reduced.
There is a misconception that UAVs (unmanned aerial vehicles) such as Predators can detect everything. They cannot. Their field of vision is like looking through a toilet paper roll. The UAVs are great for specific targets, such as watching a house, but imagine patrolling. It is like trying to visually swat mosquitoes using no ears, no sense of touch, and only the ability to look through a toilet paper roll. You will get some, and miss many.
We only have enough UAVs to cover small splotches of the country, and there are bases, roads, operations, and targets spread throughout Afghanistan and elsewhere that need watching. The enemy can spoof observers by using a “pattern of life” (POL) for camouflage. So even if our UAV operators see apparently unarmed natives moving, it is no guarantee of early detection.
Our UAVs over Afghanistan fly with their strobes flashing to avoid collisions. If a Predator or Reaper crashes into a commercial airliner because it was flying blacked out while staring at the ground, that is a problem. The enemy can see our UAVs from miles away.
A key realization: the enemy uses cheap night vision gear in the form of cameras that have night functions. When our IR lasers, our IR strobes, our IR illumination or our IR spotlights are radiating, they can easily be seen using cheap digital cameras. I recently told this to some Norwegian soldiers, who were as surprised as our soldiers to learn it. I learned this from the enemy, not from our guys. The Taliban even use smart phone cameras to watch for invisible lasers. The enemy in Afghanistan has been caught using cameras for night vision. It is just a stroke of common sense: I have been doing it for eight years since I noticed an IR laser one night in Iraq.
A Norwegian trooper explained that one dark night in Afghanistan, they got ambushed with accurate but distant machinegun fire. When they turned off their IR strobes, the fire ended. When they turned the IR strobes back on, the fires resumed. When they turned them off for good, it was over.
Many of our people believe that the enemy does not use night vision. There was a time when this was true, but the war has matured and this is now false. If your firefly is strobing on your helmet, or if you are carrying a cracked IR chemlight, do not be surprised if you take accurate fire during a black night. When JTACs mark targets with IR lasers, or when aircraft such as Predators lase for Hellfire shots or for target ID, they look like purple or green sunbeams through night vision optics and they are crazy bright. You cannot miss them.
To maximize chances of success for an assault such as that at Bastion last Friday, the Taliban know that it is best to start early, on a moonless night, just after red illum has begun. Other Afghans engaged in normal masking movements can provide POL camouflage. The enemy knows that only “Terry Taliban” is skulking around after midnight, so they start early when possible.
By 7PM last Friday, the night was very dark, and by 8PM, it was thick and black, making it a perfect time to close in on the target. Camp Bastion would appear lit up like Las Vegas, standing alone, glowing like a giant bubble of light in the “Desert of Death.” On the darkest nights, the lights of Bastion sometimes reflect orange off the clouds above, and they can be seen for miles around, causing Afghans to ask why the base glows like the morning sun, yet they do not have a drop of electricity. The days of goodwill and hope are over.
During periods of utter darkness, many of our light-intensifying systems are useless. There is not enough light for them to work with, which is why many aircraft do not fly during red illum. This also affects ground troops whose systems likewise do not have enough light to intensify, and it reduces their air cover, and thus all air and ground operations.
Last Friday was dark without infrared spotlights, or IR illumination fired from cannons and mortars. It is not always a good idea to fire those around major airbases. And besides, the spotlights and illum rounds have limitations and cannot see around contours. Thermal imagers work during complete darkness but they cannot see into hidden gullies. Ground surveillance radar (GSR) and other sensors are of limited use, especially when the enemy uses masking POL. All of these systems work together, and they can be helpful, but they can be foiled through experience and subterfuge, especially when our forces are complacent in the armored cocoons of the mega-bases.
Camp Bastion is set far back in the desert as a security precaution. Approaches can be seen for miles. Consulting Google Earth and other imagery might lead you to believe that there is no approach that cannot be observed. This is true when the air assets are up, and it is true up close whether the aerial surveillance platforms are up or not. But the desert is not flat like a billiard table. We all know what water and wind can do to terrain. The surface is closer to a waffle than to a pancake.
I scouted around Camp Bastion more than six years ago, before the camp was up and running, and since that time I have flown low-level there on many occasions. Many ripples and folds provide cover from direct observation from the base perimeter. The micro-terrain might not be obvious from Google Earth or from maps, but there are dead-space approaches that locals can use. Afghans have long been expert at traveling unseen in what appears to be wide-open territory. This is one of their strengths, and it has been described in accounts of war after war. Just as navies can hide in the open seas, Afghans can hide in treeless deserts, unless aircraft or roving patrols detect them.
The Taliban’s major vulnerability is our mastery of the air, but if they can negate it, we are approaching tactical equality because they have home turf advantage, and they have lived there since antiquity. Local Afghans have had six-years since Bastion was built to map ingress and egress routes, and to probe ISAF defenses and reactions.
This morning, four days after the attack, ISAF HQ in Kabul announced that they had arrested one of the Taliban leaders behind Friday’s attack. According to ISAF, they nabbed him in Nad ‘Ali district. This district is a green zone about sixteen miles from Camp Bastion. Some of the closest built-up areas contiguous to Nad ‘Ali are just a handful of miles away from Camp Bastion. If the enemy were coming to shoot rockets or mortars at Bastion with the intention of escaping, the hazard would be high, depending on ISAF rules of engagement. But attackers who are prepared for a one-way trip have demonstrated that they can achieve success.
Last Friday, a few hours after sunset, the Taliban struck at about 10PM. They killed two US Marines, one of them a commanding officer, and they wiped out roughly 8 percent of our Harrier jet force. Harriers are no longer manufactured, so these aircraft cannot be replaced. Scratch one squadron, and now the military must reallocate aircraft to cover the deficit.
The enemy fooled all of our high-tech gadgetry with training, observation, intelligence, terrain, planning, rehearsal, and audacity, using basic military tactics that were perfected long before anyone reading this was born. Persistence and luck was also a key factor: the Taliban have attempted similar attacks at different bases in the past with poor results. The Taliban only have to be lucky once. We have to be lucky all of the time.
The Taliban destroyed six jets, damaged two more possibly beyond repair, leaving Marine VMA-211 squadron with only two aircraft, and they killed the squadron commander.
All of this by Taliban who likely never served in any military. If they did serve, they joined up, they got some good training, and then they put it to use.
Reader support is crucial to this mission. Weekly or monthly recurring ‘subscription’ based support is the best, though all are greatly appreciated. Recurring and one-time donations are available through PayPal or Authorize.net.
To send a check or money order:
Michael Yon
P O Box 5553
Winter Haven, FL 33880-5553
I will continue to do my part in telling the stories that are not being told. Readers must also do their part by keeping the cash flowing. Cash is essential .
Thank you!
Michael








Comments
They of course also had standard NVGs. But there is surely no question the guys in the towers at as major a base as Bastion/Leather neck had and were using thermal stuff.
Other than good intel, the biggest key to this was the US uniforms worn by the attackers. Clearly they expected to be seen, not just slip in unnoticed. Would be interesting to determine where those came from. Talib have not captured enough US troops for that to be the source, not even close.
US uniforms are openly for sale at bazaars in Afghanistan. The source is most likely stolen truck shipments that come overland through Pakistan and Central Asia. There are also local copies of US uniforms for sale: not good enough to pass close inspection, but would easily pass at night.
US uniforms are not shipped there and if locals are selling US uniforms they normally will get confiscated from them.
I'm not sure what you mean by "US uniforms are not shipped there". There are warehouses full of uniforms in Afghanistan. And yes, uniforms at the bazaars in or near US military bases may be confiscated but it's a big country and we don't control all of it. I've seen brand new ACUs with the tags still on them for sale within a couple of hundred yards of the main gate to Bagram. And I should also have mentioned that a lot of uniforms end up in the trash to be picked up by local national contractors. Yes, I know they're supposed to be destroyed but a lot of them aren't. I've seen this myself too.
The fact is we have no business "nation buiding" with a bunch of dark ages tribal savages. Western democracy and freedoms are cultural and not transferable. Admitting that would go a long way toward ending this kind of meddlesome stupidity.
The US has had approximately 1,988 service people killed in the 11 years since it got involved in Afghanistan.
About the same number of people die every 3 weeks on American roads. Should we abandon the roads?
America lost nearly as many on Omaha beach in 1 day. Should America have withdrawn from D-Day as a result?
The loss of everyone single one of those wonderful men and women in Afghanistan is awful, but the level of casualties should not be over-emphasised.
Above all, America should be asking 'how do we win'?
Actually the Mujahindeen broke into several groups fighting not only themselves, but the Russian back Afghan government. And the Afghan government forces held out longer than expected. Mainly because of a pro-government militia made up of Tajiks and Herzaries who hate the Pashtuns. Then when the pro Russian Afghan government was defeated a couple of years later they each took turn occupying and shelling Kabul and being the government. Then the Muhahdeen/War Lords went to far and started not only looting but kidnapping young pre-teen boys for sex. That was to much and an unknown one-eyed preacher named Mullah Omar and religious students organized (some say with Pakistan help) to fight the war lords. They were called the Taliban. The Taliban religious students were OK fighters, but just OK. Also there was the tribal thing of not fighting each other and starting a vendetta. Then a certain person by the name of Osama bin Laden got kicked out of Sudan (everyone thought he would go to Saudi Arabia and loose his head, but the Saudi did not want him) and he offered to provide Omar with some Grade A #1 Arab shock troops to enforce discipline in the Taliban army, if he would give refuge to his organization and himself when they were kicked out of Sudan. Omar said "Hell, Yes!" and that was the start that ended with 9/11.
A Pakistani writer published a book name TALIBAN 6 months before 9/11 and many people in various intelligences agencies begged everyone who was a power that be to read it. Especially, the last chapter dealing with al Qaeda and bin Laden. They were ignored. And even today very few Americans who should have read that book.
The #1 book AFTER 9/11 that Americans should read is GOD'S TERRORISTS. It is about the first Taliban established in eastern India before the Great Indian Mutiny in 1857 (they planned and started the Mutiny not a spontaneous act over greased rifle cartridges). The British only partially destroyed them in 1857 -- ie everyone called them "Hindu Fanatics" no knowing they were Muslims. In fact the British government punished one brave British police officer in India for seeing what they were and cracking down on them. The original Taliban left overs, from 1857, made life a hell for the British -- murdering one British Viceroy -- and Hindus and Sikhs. And the British did not know it was them and blamed it on Hindus.
Jack E. Hammond
.
Not trying to be flip here, but first, define "winning." Clear objectives are the start. They are not there. They have not been there for many years, if ever they really were. Then, those objectives need to be reachable with resources we are willing to dedicate to the fight. Also not really there in a well-defined sense for many years. After that, perseverance and execution of planning. Both of which are lagging and ebbing as we speak.
Peace.
I think they already know.
The Serbs also found how to listen in on AWACS to fighter radio communications to learn about flight paths and targets.
The US and other 1st tier military forces develop a sense of hubris - "we're smarter and more advanced than these [fill-in a pejorative about the enemy here] - our technology assures our victory." Ask the Germans and Japanese about their secure codes in WWII for example. The world has come a long way since then and it doesn't take a Bletchley Park to achieve a breakthrough that negates a technological advantage. Even if a fighter never attended school he can be shown in 10 minutes how a point and shoot camera can locate the enemy in the dark.
We also need to recognize that many third world fighters get assistance from advisers and sympathizers from first world nations and their surrogates.
The same thing with communications that rely on a "secure internet" system. If they aren't interrupted, are we CERTAIN that enemies haven't found a way to decode the messages and know everything about our tactical positions and plans? With something like 5,000 cyber attacks on US defense sites daily, the law of large numbers predicts some attacks will succeed and find the chinks in our armor.
We should be concerned about "being too smart by a half".
By the way Mike, have you heard of Douglas A. Wissing's "Funding the Enemy: How U.S. Taxpayers Bankroll the Taliban" published earlier this year? It's not quite what you would think from the title. It's all about the same sort of wasteful hubris that stuck us in Viet Nam (my comparison, not the author's) Wissing knows his stuff, and it's pretty damn outrageous. The author does dip into fashionable Amerikka-bashin g now and again but fairly infrequently and not always without cause. It makes for a very discouraging litany of arrogance, ignorance and corruption and you will recognize a good deal of it, I'm afraid to say.
When I was a 2ndLt back in the early 80's, this is what they taught in basic training...and what we practiced.
Mike, why don't they teach it anymore? Are we relying too much on technology instead?
We don't have enough Soldiers / Marines in AFG. Never have.
I know this is not-PC to say but one of the reasons the attack on Bastion was easier (not impossible just easier) was the US agreeing to go along with the outlawing of AP mines. Imagine trying to approach a defended perimeter with AP mines scattered in front. The reason was the high PR campagin by NGOs from areas where one side -- or both -- scattered small foot poopers willie-nillie with no metallic content. Instead of charting where they were and digging the mine in with a hunk of metal under it. Last the US is responsible for the world problem with cluster munition (right when they got a 100% fool proof fuzing system they out lawed them) it is not responsible for the AP mine problem. Especially if our enemies still use them.
Finally, Yon you are probably unaware, but the British who invented the Harrier, have completely retired all their Harrier carriers -- but one converted to a helicopter carrier -- and Harriers (Just like the Marines AV-8B except no multi-role radar) and had put them in extended life storage. The USMC recently bought all of them for a penance and moved them to Arizona. So the lost of those eight Harriers can fortunately be replaced cheaply.
Jack E. Hammond
.
Did you deal with AV-8As or AV-8Bs? The British Harriers are better ground attack and CAS air craft than the Marines Harriers, but lack the radar to engage in air to air with radar guided missiles, engage targets at night or search for vessels when patrolling the ocean. I don't know if the Marines are going to leave the British Harriers they bought as dedicated ground attack/CAS missions or take off the nose and fit them with that multi-role radar like the rest of the Marine Harriers? Be interesting to see what decision they make.
Jack E. Hammond
.
I've heard British Soldiers call them Terry Taliban.
I know this is arm chair quarter backing, but when the Marine HQ was bombed in Lebanon, before President Reagan stepped in Admiral Sharp asked why didn't they do something as simple as bury a sewer pipe half way in the entrance road so the truck could not speed in?
To wit, when they established Bastion they had to move a lot of soil to build the runway and fill those blast container walls (for get the name if if like Helio). Why didn't they dig a dry moat around Bastion like the old fortresses of old. And have a fence on the outward facing side of the moat slightly slanting in wards with razor wire on top and filled the moat with razor wire. With fence facing slightly inwards, they can climb it easier but they will be jumping into the razor wire. Then on the other side have thousands of trip flares (better AP mines).
Jack E. Hammond
"Study the strategies used by the Pakistani Punjabi Army Generals (PPAG) from 1947 to present and you can almost predict their actions today and tomorrow. There is no way the raid on the Camp Bastion base was even possible without the active participation of the PPAG. In fact, the PPAG ordered it.
The attack was not as much in response to the killing of OBL but more as a PPAG's retaliatory response to US recently, formally designating the Pakistan-based Haqqani network as a Foreign Terrorist Organization. This branding of the Haqqani is rightly perceived by the PPAG as branding the PPAG themselves. This is an open secret in the South Asia though many Americans are not even aware of such an important, basic fact...
..The latest attack on the Camp Bastion base was without doubt one of the PPAG retaliatory response to US for declaring the Haqqani (and in turn the PPAG) an FTO.
I will bet my last dollar that the recent attacks on the American embassies and the violent riots in Libya, Egypt, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Kashmir, Indonesia and Yemen had a PPAG hand (through the Army/ISI) behind them. This is another retaliatory response of the PPAG for the Haqqani/PPAG-FT O (Foreign Terrorist Organization) episode. These international events were simply too well planned, synchronized & coordinated to be spontaneous and the Army/ISI presence there is well known."
We can win in Afghanistan if we concentrate on changing the geography with huge draglines, LeTorneau earthmovers and maybe even Operation Plowshare style nukes: and, if we kill all the insurgents like Genghis Khan. I believe that. But we won't. We aren't ruthless enough.
RSS